It's been five years since Green Lantern failed to ignite a DC Cinematic Universe. We look at what went wrong.
IMO the only thing the film did wrong, was it made itself TOO comical..
Wrong choice of director, for the material at hand. Get the fundamentals wrong and the rest will by result, go wrong.
But GoldenEye and Casino Royale were fun romps with quite a bit of good character work and Zorro also a fine character drama/fun action mix and decent origin. I'm not sure who would have been better.
Still haven't yet watched Aquaman, but how high up on that list is male & female lead going on an adventure?I am considering making a video about this. I was watching this last night now that I saw Aquaman this year and was comparing similarities between Aquaman, Wonder Woman, and Man of Steel. Then I came back to this and I saw some reasons I feel Aquaman and Wonder Woman really worked, and GL didn't.
Still haven't yet watched Aquaman, but how high up on that list is male & female lead going on an adventure?
MoS has that but happens much later and overall very meek conversations between the two.
GL's biggest mistake was having Hal come back from Oa and the rest of the movie goes on from there centered around him.
With that choice between Earth and Oa, could focusing on Oa instead have worked or would it be too out-there? Focusing on Atlantis worked well for Aquaman, although I guess Atlantis is not quite as far a leap.Actually, I think the opposite. I think the movie suffered from having 2 plotlines: Earth and Oa. When growing a mythology, you need to sprinkle it slowly so the audience can follow. Green Lantern threw to much at you too fast. I think the whole movie should have been on Earth. Parallax needed cut, or at best relegated to just possessing Hammond with no physical body. Sinestro needed to be sent to Earth (against his will) to train Hal Jordan and explain what a Green Lantern is and its mythology along the way. This movie tried to have active plots in both Earth and space, and it didn't work. The sequel should have dealt more with Oa, the history behind Parallax and the spectrum, etc. Earth and Hal's training needed to be the 1st movie.
With that choice between Earth and Oa, could focusing on Oa instead have worked or would it be too out-there? Focusing on Atlantis worked well for Aquaman, although I guess Atlantis is not quite as far a leap.
Makes sense. I hope a GLC film can focus almost exclusively on events outside Earth if and when we get one though.I don't think it would have because Oa is in another galaxy, which means Hal's core supporting cast would be basically out of the movie by Act 1. In Aquaman, despite not living there, he had roots or Vulko to build off of. Hal would have had no one to confide in on Oa as organically as Carol or his family. We could argue that Wonder Woman separated Diana from everyone in this same way, but her inexperience and her just being naive made her trusting of others and it got around that. Plus, her going on that journey was a sacrifice. I think understanding why the ring chose Hal was vital to the story.
But that's another issue: the movie says why he was chosen without justifying it on-screen. He can overcome fear, okay. When does he do that? When he succumbed to fear and crashed his jet? When he succumbed to fear and lost Carol? Etc. There isn't a moment where the movie shows us this before he has the ring. He just has one moment where he gets competitive with the drones and does something nuts, but that shows bravery and boldness. Not overcoming fear.
Makes sense. I hope a GLC film can focus almost exclusively on events outside Earth if and when we get one though.