BoredGuy
Never Did a Popular Thing
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2008
- Messages
- 11,068
- Reaction score
- 4,448
- Points
- 103
I think what allows the X-Men to keep aging so well is that the Original 5 were only 14-19 when they first started. They don't feel "too old" now that they're circling 30. And in that time, the New Mutants and Kitty were all allowed to hit their 20's. And if the X-Men were in their own little bubble of the Marvel Universe, I could see them all aging a lot more in the future.
However, because Marvel wants to keep Spider-Man feeling like a hip young 20-something forever and they wouldn't dare let Franklin Richards hit puberty, you can see everyone's aging process slowing down. It's all well and good for some of the older characters to become middle aged (I think Bruce Banner has an adult daughter running around out there), but they're holding everyone back for the sake of a handful of characters they're uncomfortable aging.
See and I really don't understand Marvel's POV on this
I started reading X-Men at 7 years old, and my assumption at the time was that Cyclops and Jean and Beast, as well as Cap, Spidey, Iron Man and the F4, were all in their lower to mid-30's. Cyclops especially I always had set in my mind at 35. Gambit, Rogue and the younger X-men I assumed were in their early 20's, then you had Gen X a couple years later who were teenagers.
I didn't want to read about kids getting superpowers, I liked that they were cool older people who I could aspire to someday be. If I were a teenager reading about teenage superheroes, I'd just get all pissed off that theyre not written realistically, and wishing I had powers.
I liked the older character's maturity and nobility, as well as the adult relationships they were involved in. Hell, I liked my superheroes having kids.
So why Marvel assumes kids will only want to read about a young Spidey, or teen Nova, or any other kid group, just doesn't make sense. Kids will read about older characters without blinking, as long as it's marketed to them well.