I have always wanted to ask this. Why do people say the "woodwork" stopped shots? When you hit the posts or crossbar, I don't even think that counts as a shoot on target. So when you hit the woodwork, isn't that just missing, unless it ricochets in?We were **** tonight, having said that we still should have comfortably won that inside the 90 but for the woodwork & of course their goalkeeper who like every other goalkeeper, seems to save their performance of the season for Manchester United.
I have always wanted to ask this. Why do people say the "woodwork" stopped shots? When you hit the posts or crossbar, I don't even think that counts as a shoot on target. So when you hit the woodwork, isn't that just missing, unless it ricochets in?
I do wonder how long Martial is going to be underrated. He's our best, most complete attacker by a lot right now. Him and Sancho could do a lot of damage, as they are a pair of players on the same level in terms of reading the game. Honestly, I'd be more excited about the Martial/Bruno/Sancho triangle then anything else at the moment.
This is better answer then I could have possibly hoped for. Thanks man for the legit response and I definitely see your point.
I genuinely don't know, when someone hits the post or crossbar while it is a miss I personally wouldn't class it as one, I know that doesn't really make sense but I'd group it more with a save than a miss. Personally for me, I'd consider hitting any part of the goal or it's frame as being on target regardless of whether it goes in or not.
As far as the bookmakers are concerned & I know this to my own misfortune, shots that strike the crossbar or post aren't classed as being on target as the goalkeeper wasn't required to make a stop & I believe that is the criteria for it being classed as on target for them anyway. I'm also not sure if a goalkeeper tips the ball over or wide, however upon the replay it looks like it was going wide or over anyway, I don't know if that's classed as on target or not.
Or likewise if someone shoots & it's going in, but a defender blocks it on the line.. it probably depends which website/company is doing the statistical analysis.
He didn’t have the same application/dedication as Messi and Ronaldo, and therefore didn’t have as great or as long a career, but at his best he was as good as them IMO.Very sad to see his woes, what a player, if you could take him for 1 season in his prime at his absolute best he's easily one of the greatest attacking midfielders ever.
It's a shame Messi was just a little behind him in terms of his development because seeing a prime Ronaldinho with Messi in his mid-twenties when he'd become a goal machine would have been incredible.
He didn’t have the same application/dedication as Messi and Ronaldo, and therefore didn’t have as great or as long a career, but at his best he was as good as them IMO.
I will never forget out of shape Ronaldinho dribbling defenders at AC Milan.I don't think he enjoyed the non-football training aspect of the game as much as others, combined with him maybe enjoying the social aspect of living in Barcelona a little too much, by the time he left to join AC Milan he was nowhere near the same level of player.. still good & could occasionally pull off a moment of brilliance, but nowhere near as consistent.
At his peak, when he was ripped, explosive, fast & unpredictable I'd without question have him alongside the all-time greats. His peak only lasted maybe 5 or 6 years between his time at PSG & Barcelona arguably, but I'd agree completely, at his best he is equally as good if not better.
While longevity is a factor when considering all-time greats, I don't consider it the defining factor. Some footballers only need 4-6 years to leave a lasting impression of their greatness & for me Ronaldinho falls into that category.
I will never forget out of shape Ronaldinho dribbling defending at AC Milan.
Where Ronaldo Classic was ravaged by injuries, Ronaldinho felt most responsible for his own demise. But at their peaks, both rival Messi as the best pure talents I have ever seen.