So I was over in the Marvel boards, where we briefly discussed Bruce in TDK (related to whether or not he had a character arc). To which I gave a brief explanation, to which someone replied.
Granted his overall opinion is still a small minority, since most people still love the Nolan films (and I don't see that changing anytime soon). But at least his first paragraph could be an indication to what milost and I were fearing the most. That as time goes on and the films sink in, TDK and TDKR would get lumped in together and it would tarnish TDK to an extent, maybe not with the GA then at least in the fan community.
And while some of you would list Star Wars and Indiana Jones as examples of where that didn't happen, I think there's two major differences between them and TDKT. First, there's about a 2-decade gap between the first trilogies and the prequels/Crystal Skull. They can be viewed more stand-alone whereas Rises came out just a few years after and was in many ways "TDK Part 2" in its marketing. Begins was a sleeper hit, TDK is the film that really took the franchise off. Second, due to the rise of TV and Hollywood training viewers more and more to think in franchises, I feel people have even more of a boxset mentality in the present than the past, for better or worse. Case in point, Marvel's just revealed a three-act trilogy of their own, except with each "phase" of films representing one part as opposed to an individual film per part.
That guy sounds like a *****e, but i have a "boxset" mentality. TDK wasn't some stand-alone film. It was a sequel. And one thing that grinds my gears the most, is a franchise that leads to crap. Or simply doesn't have an end. Im a huge fan of Sopranos, Breaking Bad, and im glad i can put TDK trilogy into a neat boxset, where it feels like a story that isn't just some never-ending adventure with a main character. Im not a fan of that.
Marvel has revealed a 3 Phase structure, which is like an enlarged trilogy of its own. But even this will probably continue past Avengers: Infinity War Part 2.
Anytime a franchise keeps going with sequels, or ends where the main character can easily keep doing what he's been doing...it makes the overall picture weak. Makes me feel like it's incomplete, like i want to see another. Or the "next episode" style ALWAYS leads to filler. Prequels or sequels. LOTR was perfect, and then they did a Hobbit trilogy. That first Hobbit sucked IMO. Star Wars kept going with garbage.
There was only one other way to go after TDK, and that was get a new director to direct Bale and his co-stars. And that film would have been another young Bruce Wayne as Batman taking on a psychological threat. Which would have been hijacked by the studio shortly after.
We must remember that even if Nolan wanted to get a message out or not, that message is still up to the viewer to interpret. BatLobster's friend thought from the get-go that Batman would be retired at the start of the next movie. I take it as Batman would endure the hatred from Gotham for
years, even if Gordon is of the belief that batman would continue physically. Gordon wouldn't be able to know in that very moment that Batman would continue or disappear forever. It's just his thoughts. And Nolans message is up the viewer. Batman is young, of course another adventure would happen after TDK, but Chris didn't know if he would do it, or another guy. The end was open-ended for a reason. But in reality, if Chris continued (with the mentality of not wanting the franchise to go on for ages), the Batman would not be able to bust criminals and save lives after Dent died. It would contradict the very message Bats wanted to send to the public. That
he's the murderer. Recluse-Wayne was the logical next step if you want to emphasize story over marketing/money.
Why would Batman be out there defending the good? So to me, Rises doesn't tarnish the meaning of TDK or ruin how people see it. I don't care what Gordon tells his child in private, or if i think "enduring" means something more spiritual/emotional than physical in the end. Whether it's physical or not, Batman endured. Bruce is Batman. They endured for 8 years. He didn't have to be out there in order to do so. It wasn't some vacation for Bruce Wayne when he ditched the Batman. Think of all nights, years that he probably spent in the batcave & Wayne Manor brooding. Or building the batcave obsessively, with no real use for it other than a wish that he could one day return. But he can't since the public must percieve him a certain way. That's pretty sad and borderline
nuts if you ask me. Sounds just like the character i love. And we know this all happened.
Maybe you just need to grow up. You don´t now the difference between using the same ip and being the same person, who cares.
Says the guy who repeats my own response and turns it against me, like a little child to a parent.