DA_Champion
Avenger
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2013
- Messages
- 11,547
- Reaction score
- 730
- Points
- 73
I'm only for a multiverse if it's for one-offs.
The thing about most characters who take over a legacy mantle as well is that it’s kinda rare for the new guy/girl to even equal the predecessor, so the new person is always in the predecessors shadow.
Or why even kill them in the first place? Superheroes are a different breed, and with a franchise like Marvel for example, with this big open world and with fans wanting to see more crossovers, they should’ve relaxed on killing people off.
They could write them out in a plethora of different ways.
Because your universe does need stakes. I love these characters, but if we go 30 movies and no one has died and stayed dead, then you lose teeth to the story. Yeah, it is a trope in comics but A - I hate this in comics as well, B - Comics come out monthly and tell far more stories and C - since they're drawings, they don't age. People age. People see this in movies. So in a movie universe, characters have to come and go at some point. It's a fact of life.
Films are a different medium. Yeah I am not saying kill characters left and right, but once that card is played, it needs to stick. Otherwise, stories lose meaning and future movies become harder to take stakes seriously.
The MCU might be the biggest franchise in the world at the moment, but let’s not forget most of the characters were created 50 years ago. The last major evolution in superheroes probably happened in the early 90’s with the likes of Spawn. We’ve yet to really have anything different emerge from the genre/medium in quite some time, the problem is I can’t see that big change happening because of those legacy characters.
It depends on the circumstances. Killing Iron Man made sense. He's a beloved character who has been around a long time, RDJ wasn't doing any more anyways, and the death was immediately felt in the following film (Spider-Man Far From Home). Killing Quicksilver was pointless. Nobody cared enough about him for it to leave any impact. Audiences weren't given enough time to connect with him.
i guess that's why Manga is getting more popular even in the states.
Execution is key in anything. But do I want to see Quicksilver brought back? No. What's done is done, imo. They've done the fake death thing enough times IMO. Leave Iron Man, Natasha, etc. Move on to other characters, unless it is a prequel type situation.
Yes.i guess that's why Manga is getting more popular even in the states.
Yes.Kind of, but I think it is more than manga is simply much easier to get into. American comics are a mess of continuity, multiple books, characters making appearances in other books, multiple writers and artists per character, etc. If you want to read One Piece (for example), it is easy. You pick up Volume 1 and start reading and eventually you get the whole story: beginning, middle, and one day it will eventually end. You can't do the same with Spider-Man.
Yes.One Piece will never end. NEVER. lol.
Kind of, but I think it is more than manga is simply much easier to get into. American comics are a mess of continuity, multiple books, characters making appearances in other books, multiple writers and artists per character, etc. If you want to read One Piece (for example), it is easy. You pick up Volume 1 and start reading and eventually you get the whole story: beginning, middle, and one day it will eventually end. You can't do the same with Spider-Man.
I still enjoyed Ant-Man and the Wasp enough, but not nearly enough as I enjoyed the first. Hopefully the third one can bounce back
Paul Rudd's Ant-Man 3 Will Reportedly Start Production Next Year
It depends on the circumstances. Killing Iron Man made sense. He's a beloved character who has been around a long time, RDJ wasn't doing any more anyways, and the death was immediately felt in the following film (Spider-Man Far From Home). Killing Quicksilver was pointless. Nobody cared enough about him for it to leave any impact. Audiences weren't given enough time to connect with him.
Not much of a fan of the sequel, but watched the first again recently and it's still great.
Hope they can bounce back with AM3, but I feel they really miss the Edgar Wright influence the first movie had.
"I am still very much under contract and I am still very much under non-disclosure agreement,"Fisher explained. "So, I've gotta be very careful about what I say and how I say it. Otherwise I could get sued into oblivion. So just a disclaimer there. So for the folks who were looking for more specifics in the moment right now, I'm sorry that I cannot give them to you in the moment right now."
"Just gotta make sure all your ducks are laid out in a row, so you can go ahead and handle the situation appropriately, so you don't end up being outside of professionally liable, legally liable for anything that could be litigious or whatever that would be," he continued. "This will take some time. We will get it done, and we will win. And I'll be able to move on in the world."
Not sure how I feel about this. If s' went down and nobody else wants to say anything and you've twice posted that accountability > entertainment and also that somethings are more important than self preservation, then why should a NDA keep you from spilling?
i guess that's why Manga is getting more popular even in the states.
Manga straight up has a better business model than American comics. The latter is pretty much half in the grave. The only reason its half rotted corpse is dangled around is as proof of concept for the movies.