A friendly reminder to our users, please make sure your account is safe. Make sure you update your password and have an active email address to recover or change your password.
I’ll really judge the MCU by how they treat the Uncanny X-Men. I am sooooo curious by how they’ll go about using mutants and the tone they will set.
Sadly, what looks to be three MCU movies with no China release has sort of dashed any hope for those movies.
Do you mean that you think by the time the X-Men are ready for release that Disney will shave off anything "controversial" to get the film a berth in China's theaters?
Judging from their Marvel embargo, by the time we get to X-Men Disney will have the team come out in support of China's treatment of the Uyghur people before the opening action sequence is done.
Iceman exists purely as a series of reaction shots. All supportive of the CCP, of course.Iceman will be there, but he'll never directly interact with any of the other members.
He will also die returning to his home planet before the first post credit scene.Iceman will be there, but he'll never directly interact with any of the other members.
I get companies will do anything for money, but the way a lot of them get on their knees and beg like little whipping boys for the Chinese Government is truly something else.
Movies are a business, and unfortunately, business controls the world.
Yet another reason why even the best comic book films can never be as good as the actual comics. Usually, it's just a matter of space (comics have much more time to develop ideas and character over a period), but even in situations like these--with any piece of art, the more money that's at stake, the more the investors want to make sure they get their money back (and profit). If the MCU X-Men films only cost a million bucks each, Disney wouldn't give a damn if they could release in China. But they don't, so...
I, for one, welcome our new entertainment overlords.
I could see Icemaf
I dunno about that. I LOVE comic books and read a crap ton of them. But I think the stronger flicks and TV shows in the Golden Age of Superhero Cinema compare favorably to the best comic book stories.
I mean, I can name a few film versions of event stories that I found to be superior (in concept) to their comics counterparts, but by-and-large, the medium of comics (and television, too) is superior to film, for my money. The ability to give stories the amount of time to fully provide nuance and detail is better than having to condense things down for a film. Some stories are simple enough to be served well by a 2/2.5 hour runtime. But when you're dealing with things that are serialized, as superheroes are, an average trilogy of films may not cut it. The MCU is starting to have this problem licked because of the D+ shows. But think of Fox's X-Men, and how many characters were under-served due to the time constraints and the politics of advertising, marketability, actor control, financial appeal... That's how you get Wolverine being the star of the X-Men films and Cyclops exists not as a character, but as a punchline and romantic obstruction for Wolverine.
More time with the characters can definitely be an advantage, which is why I appreciate Marvel Studios keeping their Disney Plus TV shows in continuity (and was annoyed when Feige and company kept AOS and the Netflix shows on the outside looking in). But in comics you have the problem of too much time to fill, leading to the illusion of change, retcons, reboots, resurrections and the like. Though the great comics are still great, there's a lot of forgettable stuff. Or as Jim Starlin once put it during his Warlock run, diamonds amongst the garbage.
There are definitely garbage comics, no doubt. Particularly, I'm not really much of a fan of where the industry has gone since about the mid-'90s. Constant events, needless tie-ins, books being sold on nothing but weak gimmicks... I guess in my heart-of-hearts, when I consider superiority, it's before the industry exploded and then put itself into this tightrope position of needing gimmick sales, to the detriment of storytelling. In the last decade, having read Chris Claremont's entire first run on X-Men and falling in love with the total storytelling freedom he managed to have in the late '70s, through the entire '80s and the very beginning of the '90s... it was there that I made peace with the times when CBMs most disappoint me. I looked at the Fox films and realized "how can they compete with such a great writer and his time and creative freedom?" Yeah, Chris couldn't just kill off anyone willy-nilly, but until the late '80s, he had little oversight from the higher-ups and was able to just tell the stories he wanted, with more elements gestating in the background, sometimes devoting whole issues to just character exploration, action be-damned. Even once the era of event comics started up, he was still granted the ability to control his end of things and maintain a high writing standard (I guess this helped by the fact that it was one event in a year and was much more focused on the mutants).
For me, the strength of Claremont's X-Men was in its devotion to character and subtlety, and you lose so much of that when you're short on time. But hey, punctuality is the thief of time.