- Joined
- Jun 16, 2007
- Messages
- 54,089
- Reaction score
- 53,796
- Points
- 218
Neither pls.I'd take Franco's Hobgoblin over what the hell they were doing in TASM2.
Neither pls.I'd take Franco's Hobgoblin over what the hell they were doing in TASM2.
But Flick it was more engaging than TASM1. That movie wished it had a modicum of SM3’s excitement.
From a quality standpoint I'd call TASM1 the better movie but Spider-Man 3 is far more entertaining. TASM2 on the other hand makes Spider-Man 3 look like Spider-Man 2.Not even the tiniest bit.
I found that movie to be more forgettable than outright bad. I can barely remember anything about it other than the flaming skull effect being an improvement over the first movie and Idris Elba having a weird French accent in it. By comparison I remember the first movie a lot more and I haven't actually watched that one since it was in theaters 17 years ago.So recently I purchased a digital copy of Ghost Rider: Spirit of Vengeance on Prime. I've never seen it and it was on sale for only five bucks so I thought, why not...
Now I'm reading online about how many folks hate the movie and consider it one of the worst CBMs every made, which is making me even more curious about it. I often find polarizing films to be far more interesting than blander, more homogenized product...
Anyway, it can't really be that bad, can it?
View attachment 89006
So recently I purchased a digital copy of Ghost Rider: Spirit of Vengeance on Prime. I've never seen it and it was on sale for only five bucks so I thought, why not...
Now I'm reading online about how many folks hate the movie and consider it one of the worst CBMs every made, which is making me even more curious about it. I often find polarizing films to be far more interesting than blander, more homogenized product...
Anyway, it can't really be that bad, can it?
View attachment 89006
So recently I purchased a digital copy of Ghost Rider: Spirit of Vengeance on Prime. I've never seen it and it was on sale for only five bucks so I thought, why not...
Now I'm reading online about how many folks hate the movie and consider it one of the worst CBMs every made, which is making me even more curious about it. I often find polarizing films to be far more interesting than blander, more homogenized product...
Anyway, it can't really be that bad, can it?
View attachment 89006
I keep forgetting there’s a second Ghost Rider movie. I need to watch it also.
Wasn't there suppose to be a whole side ark for Thor in Ultron that was eventually cut?He's absolutely right when it comes to the first two Avengers movies. It was pretty clear that Whedon didn't care much for Thor at all. He doesn't show up until about 45 minutes or so into the first movie and he's almost completely absent from the second act of Age of Ultron and even when he was there he wasn't given a whole lot of development.
That's never going to happen.Sony wants their own Avengers!
DC can't even do their own Avengers.Sony wants their own Avengers!
There probably was a lot cut from AOU involving Thor. I know Loki was originally supposed to make an appearance but that may have been as part of a vision similar to Heimdall's cameo.Wasn't there suppose to be a whole side ark for Thor in Ultron that was eventually cut?
Even so I prefer him in the first two Avengers films than in the longest running movie joke that he was in Endgame, which totally crapped on his earlier development in Infinity War. And let's not even talk about Love & Thunder where even he admits they went too far. I'd say that his character probably was the most inconsistent in the MCU, both tonally and in narrative directions they chose to take him.
And maybe I should finally watch Spirit of Vengence. I tried once and didn’t make it very far into it.
What annoys me is the inconsistency of it all.There probably was a lot cut from AOU involving Thor. I know Loki was originally supposed to make an appearance but that may have been as part of a vision similar to Heimdall's cameo.
As for Endgame, I think they went a little overboard with the humor around Thor but there were some aspects of his arc in that movie that I liked, such as getting closure with Frigga and his determination to snap everyone back into existence as a way of redeeming himself for not getting to Thanos in time. Either way it was a step down from what he was given through Ragnarok and Infinity War.