Kane52630
T-800 User
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2009
- Messages
- 116,998
- Reaction score
- 50,037
- Points
- 218
And I'm not really liking their version of the apocalyptic future. Looks too..I don't know. Like a disco with fireworks or something.
So, on point?
And I'm not really liking their version of the apocalyptic future. Looks too..I don't know. Like a disco with fireworks or something.
I guess i'm the only one who liked it...
Is that Robert Patrick on the left?
Heh, there was something about how it looked here. Might be how shiny it seemed, or maybe felt more staged. But not a dealbreaker by any means.I liked the purple lasers at least.
How much did Cameron pay for stealing the Terminator idea?
Did y'all forget?
And the legend of Hunter grows."Kiddy Connor and Jock Reese."
You'd get better cinematography with a camera phone then T3.To be fair the cinematography looks way better here than in T3.
something something pot something something kettle
So, on point?
That is the content of film in 1984. The Terminator wasn't even the top in box office, it was Ghostbuster, Beverly Hill Cop, Karate Kid, Gremlins and I kid you not Footloose.Yeah, Arnold was the original selling point, who WOULD be talking about a relatively unproven fledgling director sitting in the seats during his first big release? It took him raising the bar continuously.
Cameron is successful because he is passionate, and has worked well with teams to realize his visions.
and what darthskywalker said.
The film quality included Arnold's take on the Terminator. If it was anyone else it would probably be a generic person who couldn't convey the presence that Arnold had. There are no ifs and buts about it. As for Aliens, it was indeed an inferior film compared to Alien, I sat through both Alien film and nothing came close to the effect that the first Alien had on us audience. Avatar is Cameron's worst in term of narrative. It is true that people flock to films like Avatar because of Cameron but back in early 1980s, no one flock to see a Cameron film. But I'm digressing.Anyone who can sit through Terminator, Judgment Day and Aliens, and with a straight face say their quality has nothing to do with Cameron is "one of those".
Titanic and Avatar didn't sell on their own. They may not be my favorite films, but people flocked to them because of Cameron. And Cameron established that name in the 80s and early 90s making these films.
Lee Byung Hun was a great actor back in SoKor, but in Hollywood, he was always relegated to no-substance action man role like every other Asians who tried to break into Hollywood. It's sad.
Is that Robert Patrick on the left?
Salvation was a disappointment, but Anton Yelchin made a great Kyle Reese.
As for Aliens, it was indeed an inferior film compared to Alien, I sat through both Alien film and nothing came close to the effect that the first Alien had on us audience.
Yep, Prometheus says "hi." That ruined the Aliens more than anything Cameron did.I had no idea that you spoke for everyone. You're the same person who will complain about what Cameron did to the alien yet look the other way about what Ridley did to the Jockeys.