- Joined
- Aug 24, 2011
- Messages
- 52,445
- Reaction score
- 25,666
- Points
- 118
They'll probably just skip Anti-Venom and go straight to Toxin and Scream.I think so, but who knows if they get that far. They haven't even done Anti-Venom yet lol
They'll probably just skip Anti-Venom and go straight to Toxin and Scream.I think so, but who knows if they get that far. They haven't even done Anti-Venom yet lol
EDIT: And I will always maintain that Raimi's version of Venom was much closer to the spirit of the books than Hardy's. I really think the reason Venom was received so poorly in Spider-Man 3 was because of Topher's casting. Had Raimi hired a different actor with a bit more of a naturally sinister edge, I believe his version of Venom might have been much more warmly received.
Toxin was already hinted at last movie cause the cop already seemed symbiote infected. So I don't see Eddie ever getting Toxin unless it's for a brief bit in an action scene. Scream may be in it though, but then we also have Chiwetel Ejiofor in this and he is probably the main villain. Whoever that is lolThey'll probably just skip Anti-Venom and go straight to Toxin and Scream.
Everything out of Peltz mouth is like the worst boomer hot takes.And regarding Peltz, it’s like I’ve been saying for a while now. It really breaks my heart to see how powerful white people stole the term ‘woke’ and now use it as a code for the n-word.
Just racist, rich and dumb.
Tom Hardy do slap stick physical comedy is why these Venom movies are worth watching. Tom Hardy playing around with a lobster is more entertaining than a lot of other superhero movie scenes.I have negative interest in Venom in the comics and always have. I've never enjoyed a single "serious" Venom story. They're just a vehicle for Tom Hardy to be a weirdo which I am wildly more interested in than more conventional superhero/villain stuff even if the movies obviously aren't good by normal movie standards.
Venom movies having some very talented actors wasted in lame roles is the hallmark of this franchise Michelle Williams, Riz Ahmed, Woody Harrelson, Naomie Harris, Stephen Graham and Juno Temple.Chiwetel Ejiofor is in Venom 3? Ugh. I hate the way the MCU has pretty much sidelined him and now he’s taking roles in the Sony MarvAdjacent Universe. He deserves better than both.
Dude was wasted as a Hell demon in Dr. Strange? No wonder I couldn't place him in the MCU.Chiwetel Ejiofor is in Venom 3? Ugh. I hate the way the MCU has pretty much sidelined him and now he’s taking roles in the Sony MarvAdjacent Universe. He deserves better than both.
So an animated R-rated Venom movie is fine but giving Let There Be Carnage an R rating was a bridge too far?
Sony, Sony, Sony...
I like Hardy as Venom. 2nd best superhero performance right now? That's not a hill I can join on. But I do enjoy him in the role a lot
Isn't Toxin more of an ally or at least like Venom.
Doesn't Toxin's host die and he bonds with Eddie at one point?
True, I just wish they had played with the idea of an R-rated movie with Carnage without having to worry about watering it down in a Spider-Man movie.I mean, it didn't start as an R rated franchise. So, they probably didn't want to rock the boat. Plus, you know, they hoped to get it into China. I am still curious about their China cut/translation.
True, I just wish they had played with the idea of an R-rated movie with Carnage without having to worry about watering it down in a Spider-Man movie.
On the last point (the edit), the Hardy Venom films are an absolute essential comedy part of my life at this point, but I wouldn't mind also seeing a more horror-style Venom that is very hard to stop and kill off in a serious Spidey film. Obviously if you want that to be at all believable you also need to cast Brock as someone very different to Topher Grace (the dude playing Flint Marko was right there ).I completely see your point, Deckster
I can appreciate the Hardy films as goofy harmless fun, but I can totally see how true fans of the Venom character would have serious issues with those movies.
I actually brought this point up awhile ago in a Spider-Man thread. I remember it being somewhat polarizing at the time but what the hell, that's never stopped me before
Venom is one of the primary reasons I live in hope that Disney/Marvel will eventually get the rights to Spider-Man back. Again I enjoy watching the first two Venom movies for the cheesy fun they are, but the bottom line is that many of Spidey's villains don't make sense thematically when you remove them from the Spider-Man mythos. While I acknowledge that Venom isn't necessarily dependent on Spider-Man in the comics anymore, I do think that for an origin story there's something missing if you skip straight to Eddie being the first to have the symbiote and bypass Peter entirely, as the Sony films have done.
Venom was a character born of rage, frustration, humiliation, rejection, jealousy, scorn, and vengeance, all of it revolving around Peter/Spider-Man where Brock and the symbiote were concerned. Remove all that and he's no longer the true Venom from the books...
Anyway I have a sneaking suspicious that the third Venom film won't approach the box office of the first two. After all, the question now is how will Sony create additional excitement for the franchise after having already blown their mother lode by using Venom's most famous antagonist, Carnage? Who will be the villain in Venom 3? Riot? Scream?
I'd be very surprised if the Hardy franchise continues after this third installment. However, my box office predictions have been so far off the mark lately that it's not even funny. I'm prepared to be humiliated once again
EDIT: And I will always maintain that Raimi's version of Venom was much closer to the spirit of the books than Hardy's. I really think the reason Venom was received so poorly in Spider-Man 3 was because of Topher's casting. Had Raimi hired a different actor with a bit more of a naturally sinister edge, I believe his version of Venom might have been much more warmly received.
Prayers answered?
Me seeing the Venom slander in here
Prayers answered?
I'm enjoying '97 a lot but Spectacular is the only Marvel cartoon with a particularly creatively justifiable reason to bring it back. The 97 style revival is cute to do for an old show once, Spectacular is a great series that was cut severely short so I'd be down for it to be brought back but apart from that I'd really rather they do new takes rather than revive old ones.It sucks, because the VASTLY superior show is right there.