A friendly reminder to our users, please make sure your account is safe. Make sure you update your password and have an active email address to recover or change your password.
That's great news. I'm very interested to see where they take a sequel.
Looks like a sequel is taking shape at Fox. The studio has locked in Andy Serkis to return, a multi-film contract that ensures him a seven-figure salary. Rupert Wyatt's contract includes a sequel option, so he's returning as well. Screenwriters Rick Jaffa and Amanda Silver are returning to write, alongside the original producers. They're in the idea stage, so no release date or production date is set yet.
http://www.deadline.com/2011/11/and...al-should-fox-campaign-for-oscar/#more-190449
Fox will also organize a big Oscar campaign for Andy Serkis' performance as well.
This is good news. I wonder if they'll pick up where they left it or jump ahead a few years.
maybe we will get that scene with the home release?THR reveals that the ending as seen in the film was the reshoots conducted a month before the film came out. Originally,. That reshot ending took about three hours to do, but it further complicated the final weeks of post-production.James Franco's character dies
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/ne...d:+thr/film+(The+Hollywood+Reporter+-+Movies)
Interesting.
can you explain why you think an actor shoudl get an acting nomination when the movies character performance is a combination of actor and cgi artist?I would love to see Andy Serkis get an Oscar nomination for this. It could really open things up, especially as we continue with the trend of mo-cap performances in movies..
Thats not happening . The oscars don't really consider mo-cap to be "real" acting. If anything he should have been nominated for his role as Gollum. I think that maybe the academy should consider having a new category were they include mo-cap performances as well as voice acting. I always felt mo-cap and voice actors deserve more recognition then they get.Is Serkis is submitted for Supporting Actor, and he get great 'For Your Consideration' campaign, he can get in. This year the Supporting Actor race is a bit weak.
everytime WETA worked on the effects.and everytime animators from WETA worked on the CGI character. its a lie that 100% from Serkis is on Gollum and Caesar. sometimes animators animated some scenes without Serkis .Jackson knows this. animators at WETA knows this. the fact is that its a CGI creation that you see on screen. a lot of people worked on one character.its not that simple. its not just digital prosthetics. .^Its not really that strange, in all his mo-cap performances he has been brilliant, but we never get to see his face and in real life he doesnt exactly look the Hollywood type. He was in The Prestige remember.
in LOTR they didnt use mo cap for Serkis face. every second of Gollum was hand animated by the animators. and a lot of times Jackson worked alone with the animators without Serkis. over 50% of Gollum is inspired by what Serkis did. i am trying to say that Caesar was more from Serkis then Gollum. so if you would like to give him an award then he deserves it mroe for POTA then LOTR.Thats not happening . The oscars don't really consider mo-cap to be "real" acting. If anything he should have been nominated for his role as Gollum. I think that maybe the academy should consider having a new category were they include mo-cap performances as well as voice acting. I always felt mo-cap and voice actors deserve more recognition then they get.