Thread Manager
Moderator
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2011
- Messages
- 0
- Reaction score
- 3
- Points
- 1
This is a continuation thread, the old thread is [split]476795[/split]
I'm aware the early PotA movies referenced the Civil Rights movement. This was made obvious with the dialogue.
This series uses Animal Farm plotlines almost directly.
Animal Farm is about class warfare. Is it not?
Yes, Animal Farm is...but this doesn't follow THAT closely, and tends to follow the more political message rather than class warfare. What...is it saying that apes are above apes?? That makes no sense...and it eventually is shown to be about a particular ape's quest for power and his followers enslaving/killing those who oppose him. I guess you could REEEEEEEEALLY stretch it to say that the apes who take control are a higher "class" than the apes they fight against...but it isn't really about who is smarter or better or more worthy, aside from "strength = power" and that the strong are the rightful rulers. The false flag attack is something the Nazis did, and they also put people in cages. I just don't think the class warfare issue is as important to the filmmakers as the other points they are making.
Have you researched Animal Farm?
Farmers represented the upper class humans and the farm animals represented the working class humans.
Caesar is obviously Snowball, the idealistic leader who is chased away once animals gain control the farm.
Koba is Napoleon, the sneaky and cruel leader who chases away Snowball and controls the farm with an iron fist.
If they followed Animal Farm any closer Fox would get sued.
It doesn't matter if physical strength determined leadership in the movie. The black race doesn't determine leadership that way.
But I'm glad you noticed the False Flag attack. We may disagree on interpretation but it's clear you were paying attention.
Oh for christ sake, some of you are putting way too much thought into this.
The upper class humans who were desperate for the power they didn't have to prevent their deaths?? The humans were in no way powerful. They were the tattered remains of humanity. It is a HUGE leap to compare them to the upper class. They were DYING without the help of the natives...which reminds me of the old stories of the white people who were dying until the Native Americans saved their lives. Trusting the white man didn't get them very far though.
So, yes...Koba did follow that story of taking power for himself and ruling with an iron fist..but he turned into tyrant in a movie about racism. The movie simply shifted gears in the final act. It seems as if they wanted to make the white man the villain the entire film...and then realized that the apes had to be the bad guys, so they turned Koba into Hitler. The first two thirds of the movie are just FULL of race allegories...and then it just abruptly becomes Animal Farm/Hitler. To me...that story should be told in another movie, after the apes have won. That way, you have two sides arguing over whether to live in peace or to become the monsters they despised. That is a story worth 2 hours.
Oh for christ sake, some of you are putting way too much thought into this.
It's a sci-fi movie...where if you aren't thinking hard about it, you likely aren't "getting" the full message of the movie. If there is no secondary "point" to a sci-fi movie, then odds are they just wanted to make a dumb film like Transformers. This isn't Transformers.
I believe that you should be able to describe most good sci-fi movies without mentioning the actual sci-fi elements. "Humans vs aliens" means NOTHING...but "the injustice of South African Apartheid" DOES mean something...and that story is the secondary story in District 9. If you watched District 9 and DIDN'T pick up on that, then you missed a part of the film and shouldn't say that people are putting too much thought into it.
It's like when people say "all zombie movies are the same." Um...no...Dawn of the Dead is about consumerism...The Returned is about the AIDS crisis...Antisocial is about addiction to social media...Dead Girl is about misogyny etc etc etc. If someone says "you're putting too much thought into stupid zombies" then they are missing much of the substance.
Debates and deep analysis like these is why I don't post much in movie threads anymore,Films are meant for entertainment and not to be dissected by every little piece and debating what it all really meant and of it had more deep messages
But whatever,anyway..I was hoping they'd mention Will's fate,I assume he simply just died with the virus but would have liked it confirmed somehow
I'd say the humans in Dawn were Farmer Jones from Animal Farm. They're desperate because they lose control of the farm. They even ask for reinforcement from other farmers just like the book.
and first Koba was a black guy performing a minstrel show and now he's Hitler? Which one is it?
Back to the movie:
When Oldman's character tells Malcolm they had reached the military on the com, i thought he was bluffing to distract him, but since it was brought up at the end that the military was indeed on the way, i guess he was telling the truth.
Not to mention that in the trailer they show what looks like a Navy ship showing up, so this could be a deleted scene that was meant to show this.
It's one thing to have meanings and commentary, it's another thing to have a film be commentating on something specific. Dawn doesn't do any of that, it's not a allegory for something that's happened to a specific group of people, in fact it's kinda generic because both species are free in the first place. So yeah from what I've read over the last couple of pages it does seem like too much thought is being put into it, or at the very lest too much of an attempt to link things to something else.
I doubt the writers were looking to recreate Animal Farm. That being said, there's nothing wrong when some people do see parallels to other works of literature. What is wrong is when they assume it's obvious and anyone who disagrees only wants "a dumb action movie like Transformers".
There should be a Godwin's Law for movie discussions that says inevitably someone will tell another poster that they probably enjoy "dumb movies like Transformers" if they don't agree that a film has deeper meaning than what is presented on screen.
So...let me get this straight...
People venture into a new, undeveloped land. They meet natives there who they view as savages, but the natives (whose leader wears face paint) resist war and in fact offer to help the visitors who are new to their land. However, the newcomers are planning to permanently settle there, alter the way of life there, and exterminate the natives if it is convenient for them to do so.
Sounds like the white man arriving in America and meeting the natives to me. And from what I recall from history class, the natives were not slaves, so both the settlers and natives were free.
I doubt the writers were looking to recreate Animal Farm. That being said, there's nothing wrong when some people do see parallels to other works of literature. What is wrong is when they assume it's obvious and anyone who disagrees only wants "a dumb action movie like Transformers".
There should be a Godwin's Law for movie discussions that says inevitably someone will tell another poster that they probably enjoy "dumb movies like Transformers" if they don't agree that a film has deeper meaning than what is presented on screen.