Avatar: The Way Of Water

[Scarlet Spider]

Guys, @GothamCity is a troll. Don't feed him.

 

[BoredGuy]

I thought the first movie was just so-so, and doesn't deserve to be the top-grossing film of all time (and if it wasn't for re-releases it wouldn't be)
But to say the movie isn't beautiful is a bit much. There are some scenes involving the humans interacting with CG elements that don't look perfect, but anything that's fully CGI looks amazing for the most part

 

[Stringer]

Accountable? What does that even mean in this context? It's a movie reaction.

Say something hyperbolic and be called out for an outrageous opinion. It's not difficult to understand.

 

[Kane52630]

Here's the typical mob at it again.

 

[Blade Hoarder]

Say something hyperbolic and be called out for an outrageous opinion. It's not difficult to understand.

Called out by whom? People who haven’t seen the movie? Also, how do you know it’s outrageous? You were at the screening?

 

[TheVileOne]

Accountable? What does that even mean in this context? It's a movie reaction.

Accountable for expressing a personal opinion about a movie?

 

[moviedoors]

Say something hyperbolic and be called out for an outrageous opinion. It's not difficult to understand.

Dude, any professional film critic whose worked for any notable amount of time has already and is continually getting a deluge of “call outs” from people who can’t handle someone not agreeing with their opinion.

 

[TheVileOne]

Say something hyperbolic and be called out for an outrageous opinion. It's not difficult to understand.

Why is it outrageous?

 

[TheVileOne]

Here's the typical mob at it again.

I'm about ready to turn in a man card if this is what it means to have one.

 

[moviedoors]

Called out by whom? People who haven’t seen the movie? Also, how do you know it’s outrageous? You were at the screening?

What does “being held accountable” even look like here? The only thing I can picture is people trolling and talking **** to critics, and that’s definitely not a good idea.

 

[TheVileOne]

What does “being held accountable” even look like here? The only thing I can picture is people trolling and talking **** to critics, and that’s definitely not a good idea.

To me being held accountable would be like if they did something wrong. But all I see here is a bunch of glowing positive reactions to an early screening of the movie.

So maybe you see it and don't like Avatar 2, but how is it outrageous? Why is it wrong and outrageous to feel differently about a movie?

 

[DarkKnight88]

 

[Stringer]

Dude, any professional film critic whose worked for any notable amount of time has already and is continually getting a deluge of “call outs” from people who can’t handle someone not agreeing with their opinion.

Just curious, how would you view this critic going forward if you go on to absolutely hate this movie?

Called out by whom? People who haven’t seen the movie? Also, how do you know it’s outrageous? You were at the screening?

I already said he may very well be correct.

Why is it outrageous?

In the end it may not be, but does it effect the credibility of the critic at all if Avatar 2 is considered one of the worst sequels ever? No, a critic can just essentially say whatever on a whim and maintain their status. What's the standard here? Ok, maybe it's just me, but I just prefer measured reactions.

 

[moviedoors]

Just curious, how would you view this critic going forward if you go on to absolutely hate this movie?

I would read the review, try and engage with it fairly, and maybe see if I'm able to understand where they're coming from, even if I don't agree.

You know, like a grown-up.

In the end it may not be, but does it effect the credibility of the critic at all if Avatar 2 is considered one of the worst sequels ever? No, a critic can just essentially say whatever on a whim and maintain their status. What's the standard here? Ok, maybe it's just me, but I just prefer measured reactions.

It's movies. The standard is personal taste. That's it. You can't create a measurable, objective standard with which to measure them. Literally impossible.

And you still haven't defined exactly what you mean by "accountable." What does that mean? Getting **** talked on twitter and just taking it? Their boss writing them up? Getting fired?

 

[GothamCity]

There where so many times a critic praised a film and after i watched it i was like, really this isnt that good.

Also there are times i like the film much more then the critic.

 

[moviedoors]

There where so many times a critic praised a film and after i watched i was like, really this isnt that good.

Ok I get it now; you are a troll.

 

[GothamCity]

Ok I get it now; you are a troll.

No, thats a strange thing to say after my nuached opinion.

 

[Kane52630]

 

[:eek:]

'Avatar The Way of Water' Is Setting Box-Office Records In India Ahead Of It's Release. Here's How (outlookindia.com)

 

[TheVileOne]

In the end it may not be, but does it effect the credibility of the critic at all if Avatar 2 is considered one of the worst sequels ever? No, a critic can just essentially say whatever on a whim and maintain their status. What's the standard here? Ok, maybe it's just me, but I just prefer measured reactions.

What are you even talking about right now? Where is this coming from?

 

[Kane52630]

 

[Kane52630]

 

[:eek:]

Avatar: The Way of Water promises bright future for Chinese cinemas (ecns.cn)

 

[:eek:]

Forecast keeps climbing
Long Range Box Office Forecast: Blumhouse's M3GAN Tracking for a Solid 2023 Lead Off, Plus the Latest Avatar: The Way of Water Projections - Boxoffice (boxofficepro.com)

 

[Kane52630]

Forecast keeps climbing
Long Range Box Office Forecast: Blumhouse's M3GAN Tracking for a Solid 2023 Lead Off, Plus the Latest Avatar: The Way of Water Projections - Boxoffice (boxofficepro.com)

Interesting, the high range prediction has it beating Endgame in the all time rankings.